Tests to Evaluate Public Health Disease Reporting Systems in Local Public Health Agencies

David J. Dausey, Nicole Lurie, Alexis Diamond, Barbara Meade, Roger C. Molander, Karen A. Ricci, Michael A. Stoto, Jeffrey Wasserman

ResearchPublished Jul 14, 2005

Despite the importance of public health disease reporting systems in an age of increasing globalization, few standardized tools have been developed to help public health agencies evaluate their effectiveness. This operations manual provides public health agencies with a set of standardized proficiency tests to aid in the development of regular and consistent strategies for testing the ability of public health disease reporting systems to receive and respond to case reports 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The manual serves as a guidebook for planning a test and as a training and reference manual for individuals conducting a test; provides tools and templates necessary to conduct the tests; and provides benchmarks to evaluate testing performance. The goal of these tests is to assess whether a local public health agency has sufficient proficiency to respond to public health disease reports as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The tests are intended to be used over time to regularly monitor and improve performance of public health disease reporting systems.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 2005
  • Pages: 96
  • Document Number: TR-260-DHHS

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Dausey, David J., Nicole Lurie, Alexis Diamond, Barbara Meade, Roger C. Molander, Karen A. Ricci, Michael A. Stoto, and Jeffrey Wasserman, Tests to Evaluate Public Health Disease Reporting Systems in Local Public Health Agencies. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2005. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR260.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.