Talking Policy

An examination of public dialogue in science and technology policy

Steven Wooding, Amanda Watt, Pernilla Lundin, Tom Ling

ResearchPublished Mar 23, 2005

Cover: Talking Policy
Download PDF
Additional Downloads

Includes Summary Only

This report makes recommendations for how public consultation can be fed into policy debates in science and technology. The UK based study draws from four case studies and a twenty-two respondent web survey. The case studies were the public dialogue activities run for the 2003 Energy White Paper; those around the use of sex selection organised by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority; those surrounding the UK BioBank, a population biomedical sample collection; and three run by the Food Standards Agency. There were recommendations for policy centred around four themes. Firstly, preserving capacity, that of the public to engage in consultations and of contractors to provide the consultations needed. Secondly, clarity and planning, that there needed to be clarity in how the consultation could affect policy and all possible outcomes needed to be considered. Thirdly, synthesis of policy, that organisations should reflect on the transparency of their policy process when combining numerous streams of evidence. Finally, evaluation and learning, that there was little external evaluation of projects or explicit sharing of lessons learned.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2005
  • Pages: 123
  • Document Number: TR-268-CST

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Wooding, Steven, Amanda Watt, Pernilla Lundin, and Tom Ling, Talking Policy: An examination of public dialogue in science and technology policy, RAND Corporation, TR-268-CST, 2005. As of October 10, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR268.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Wooding, Steven, Amanda Watt, Pernilla Lundin, and Tom Ling, Talking Policy: An examination of public dialogue in science and technology policy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2005. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR268.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was prepared for the Council for Science and Technology and was conducted by RAND Europe.

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.