Setting the Agenda for an Evidence-based Olympics

Lindsay Clutterbuck, Edward Nason, Lynne Saylor, Ruth Levitt, Lisa Klautzer, Michael Hallsworth, Lila Rabinovich, Samir Puri, Greg Hannah, Aruna Sivakumar, et al.

ResearchPublished Oct 15, 2007

Download PDF

Includes all sections.

To prepare for the London 2012 Olympic Games, it will be vital to ensure that the planning, delivery and legacy of the Games are fully accountable and based on the soundest evidence base available. The evidence base for specific policies can be built on two main foundations. Firstly, on the available evidence from previous mega-events; and secondly, through new primary research that places the challenges faced by the Olympics in the London context. In this report we present a meta-analysis of Olympic Games and mega-event policy issues based on a literature review of previous evaluations and analyses, to identify key issues that should be addressed in order to contribute to London 2012’s aspiration as the most successful modern Games. We highlight two policy areas (transport and infrastructure, and security) in which specific research tools can be used to facilitate evidence-based policy making. In order to understand the evidence base required for transport and infrastructure, we have investigated the sorts of issues that can be addressed and provided a selection of potential studies that would provide high quality primary evidence for policy making for the Games. These studies make use of a number of modelling techniques in use at RAND Europe. Security is a particularly big concern for the modern Olympics. Through investigating previous threats, we can identify the likely threat types to London 2012. By understanding the interaction of hostile intent; operational capability; and potential influences on security, we can start to identify the security capabilities required to address different threats to security during London 2012.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2007
  • Pages: 77
  • Document Number: TR-516-RC

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Clutterbuck, Lindsay, Edward Nason, Lynne Saylor, Ruth Levitt, Lisa Klautzer, Michael Hallsworth, Lila Rabinovich, Samir Puri, Greg Hannah, Aruna Sivakumar, Flavia Tsang, Peter Burge, and Cameron Munro, Setting the Agenda for an Evidence-based Olympics, RAND Corporation, TR-516-RC, 2007. As of October 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR516.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Clutterbuck, Lindsay, Edward Nason, Lynne Saylor, Ruth Levitt, Lisa Klautzer, Michael Hallsworth, Lila Rabinovich, Samir Puri, Greg Hannah, Aruna Sivakumar, Flavia Tsang, Peter Burge, and Cameron Munro, Setting the Agenda for an Evidence-based Olympics. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2007. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR516.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The report was performed as part of the RAND Corporation’s continuing program of self-initiated research. The research was conducted by RAND Europe.

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.