Strengthening Research Portfolio Evaluation at the Medical Research Council

Developing a survey for the collection of information about research outputs

Sharif Ismail, Jan Tiessen, Steven Wooding

ResearchPublished Mar 15, 2010

The Medical Research Council (MRC) wished to better understand the wider impact of MRC research output on society and the economy. The MRC wanted to: compare the strengths of different types of funding and areas of research; identify the good news stories and successes it can learn from. As an initial step in this process RAND Europe: (1) examined the range of output and outcome information MRCalready collected; and (2) to used that analysis to suggest how data collection could be improved. This report outlines the approach taken to the second part of this exercise and focuses on the development of a new survey instrument to support the MRC’s data collection approach. Readers should bear in mind that some later stages of survey development and implementation were conducted exclusively by the MRC and are not reported here.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2010
  • Pages: 70
  • Document Number: TR-743-MRC

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Ismail, Sharif, Jan Tiessen, and Steven Wooding, Strengthening Research Portfolio Evaluation at the Medical Research Council: Developing a survey for the collection of information about research outputs, RAND Corporation, TR-743-MRC, 2010. As of September 24, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR743.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Ismail, Sharif, Jan Tiessen, and Steven Wooding, Strengthening Research Portfolio Evaluation at the Medical Research Council: Developing a survey for the collection of information about research outputs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2010. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR743.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This research in this report was sponsored by the Medical Research Council (UK) and conducted by RAND Europe.

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.