Army Warfighters' Forums Can Be Innovative and Successful
Dec 5, 2011
|PDF file||1 MB|
|PDF file||0.1 MB|
|Add to Cart||Paperback172 pages||$36.50||$29.20 20% Web Discount|
This research examined leader-, soldier- and unit-level outcomes associated with the Army's first warfighters' forum, the Stryker Brigade Combat Team Warfighters' Forum (SWfF). Specifically, the study explored leaders' and soldiers' usage of and satisfaction with products and services offered by SWfF; the extent to which a SWfF-offered tactical training tool improved individuals' tactical knowledge; and whether a handbook derived from combat returnees' experiences improved unit-level tactical performance. Its broader purpose was to determine whether and how SWfF products are associated with knowledge acquisition and tactical proficiency, as well as to explore ways in which SWfF, and similar forums, could better support tactical units in the future. The results show that SWfF supports training and preparation for war, and that its methods can help the Army adapt to changing tactical landscapes. SWfF usage and satisfaction levels were high. Training tools provided by SWfF were statistically associated with gains in individual-level tactical knowledge and unit-level performance at the Combat Training Centers. The study suggests that warfighters' forums should continue to be developed, remain focused on providing information as quickly as possible, and continually monitor the views of their communities regarding the products and services they offer. In addition, the study offers two broader considerations for the Army training community. First, embed feedback reports into more training tools. Second, continue to develop and refine the technique demonstrated in this study for converting soldier and leader combat experience into information that can be easily used by units preparing for deployment.
SWfF Successfully Reached and Supported SBCT Co
SWfF Training Tools Improved Tactical Knowledge of Most Study Participants
Training Handbook Improved Unit-Level Tactical Performance
Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations
Hundredth House Assessment Instrument
hundredth House Assessment Instrument Scoring Techniques
Hundredth House Scale Reliability Details
Combat Returnees Survey
Combat Returnees Survey Codebook Development and Coding Procedures.
Iraq Common Event Approaches Handbook
Ten Event Scenario CTC Observer Questionnaires
CTC Observer Questionnaire Instructions
Unit-Level Performance Regression Description
The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army and conducted by the RAND Arroyo Center
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.