Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Research Questions

  1. Can a methodology be generated to examine translational research and knowledge exchange across an entire value chain?
  2. Can this methodology be applied to analyse the wheat value chain in the UK?
  3. What mechanisms can help to maintain the evidence bases for translational research and knowledge exchange?

This report considers how translational research and knowledge exchange can be enhanced throughout the food and agricultural value chain so that best use is made of public and private investment in research and knowledge generation.

The project's aims were: to generate a robust, generic and transferable methodology for examining translational research and knowledge exchange across an entire value chain; apply and validate this methodology to deliver a robust evidence base for translational research and knowledge exchange in the wheat value chain in the UK; and outline mechanisms for maintaining the evidence bases.

Important enablers of translational research include: the development of fora to facilitate knowledge exchange and to enable development of a synthesis of existing knowledge on specific topics; involving key actors and targeting end users across the value chain in a more systematic and informed manner; the effective use of policy.

Key Findings

The preferred method of knowledge exchange varies by participant

  • Knowledge intermediaries place a high value on face-to-face interaction, reflecting the often tacit nature of the knowledge required for effective translation.
  • For knowledge producers, conferences were the preferred mode of knowledge exchange.

Some value chains may be too complex to analyse properly

  • The complexity of the wheat value chain, which is long and feeds into many products, was considered a challenge to translational research.
  • Recent price volatility also inhibited translational research in the wheat value chain, making it difficult to assess the economic benefit of uptake of new products and processes.

Three key activities enable translational research

  • Fora must be developed to facilitate knowledge exchange.
  • Across the value chain, key actors must be involved and end users targeted in a more systematic and informed manner.
  • Policy must be used effectively to drive innovation and knowledge exchange based on a translational approach.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Definitions, conceptual framework and methodological approach

  • Chapter Three

    Using data on actors and activities to capture translational research in the wheat value chain

  • Chapter Four

    Modes of translational research and knowledge exchange in the UK wheat value chain

  • Chapter Five

    Barriers and enablers of translational research and knowledge exchange in the UK wheat value chain

  • Chapter Six

    Potential for improving translational research and knowledge exchange in the UK wheat value chain

  • Appendix A

    Additional detail on the methodology

  • Appendix B

    List of interviewees in the UK wheat value chain

  • Appendix C

    List of workshop participants

  • Appendix D

    Background description of project on improving protein content of wheat

  • Appendix E

    Developing and maintaining the evidence base of the UK wheat value chain

  • Appendix F

    Analysis of translational research and knowledge exchange by knowledge users, intermediaries and producers

  • Appendix G

    List of actors and activities used in the actor-activities and actor-actor matrices

  • Appendix H

    Organisation of production and marketing activities in agri-food

Research conducted by

The research described in this document was prepared for BBSRC and Defra and conducted by RAND Europe.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.