Kan een maatschappelijke kosten-batenanalyse worden gebruikt voor de beoordeling van innovatieprogramma’s?

[Can a ‘societal’ cost-benefit analysis be used for the evaluation of innovation-programs?]

Gigi van Rhee

Published Apr 21, 2006

Download PDF

(in Dutch)

For the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs an essay is written that discusses the suitability of ‘societal’ cost-benefit analysis to judge innovation-programs, innovation themes and projects within the setting of the new programmatic approach. The traditional societal cost benefit analysis used in the Netherlands to judge infrastructure projects, is not considered suitable without any changes to the method. The method insufficiently considers a number of specific characteristics of innovation programmes like uncertainty, differences in risks and portfolio aspects. Execution of the method suffers from lack of reliable data both ex ante as ex post. Besides, the approach is not easily understandable, and does not include a test of legitimacy or effectiveness. Therefore another approach that combines amongst others multi-criteria analysis, portfolio analysis and a quick scan cost-benefit analysis is suggested to properly judge innovation projects/themes and programs.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2006
  • Pages: 21
  • Document Number: WR-366-EZ

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

van Rhee, Gigi, Kan een maatschappelijke kosten-batenanalyse worden gebruikt voor de beoordeling van innovatieprogramma’s? [Can a ‘societal’ cost-benefit analysis be used for the evaluation of innovation-programs?]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2006. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR366.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.