The authors look at the effect of the 2000 repeal of the earnings test above the normal retirement age on retirement expectations of workers in the Health and Retirement Study, aged 51 to 61 in 1992. For men, they find that those whose marginal wage rate increased when the earnings test was repealed, had the largest increase in the probability to work full-time past normal retirement age. They do not find significant evidence of effects of the repeal of the earnings test on the probability to work past age 62 or the expected claiming age. On the other hand, for those reaching the normal retirement age, deviations between the age at which Social Security benefits are actually claimed and the previously reported expected age are more negative in 2000 than in 1998. Since their calculations show that the tax introduced by the earnings test was small when accounting for actuarial benefit adjustments and differential mortality, their results suggest that although male workers form expectations in a way consistent with forward-looking behavior, they misperceive the complicated rules of the earnings test. Results for females suggest similar patterns but estimates are imprecise.
Michaud, Pierre-Carl and Arthur Van Soest, How did the Elimination of the Earnings Test above the Normal Retirement Age affect Retirement Expectations?. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2007. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR478.html.
Michaud, Pierre-Carl and Arthur Van Soest, How did the Elimination of the Earnings Test above the Normal Retirement Age affect Retirement Expectations?, Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation, WR-478, 2007. As of October 05, 2022: https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR478.html