Bibliometric analysis of highly cited publications of health research in England, 1997-2003
Theme specific HCPs in England
Published Jul 31, 2007
Theme specific HCPs in England
Published Jul 31, 2007
This working paper describes a bibliometric analysis to support the process of identifying candidate biomedical research units as part of the UK Department of Health’s R&D strategy, Best Research for Best Health. It focuses specifically on six specific research areas of high disease burden and clinical need that are currently underrepresented in the portfolios of the Biomedical Research Centres put in place as part of Best Research for Best Health: (1) cardiovascular disease, (2) deafness and hearing problems, (3) gastrointestinal (including liver) disease, (4) musculoskeletal disease, (5) respiratory disease, and (6) nutrition, diet and lifestyle (including obesity). The bulk of the working paper consists of a tabular and graphic presentation of the percentage and distribution of highly cited papers in each research area.
The research described in this report was prepared for the Department of Health and conducted by RAND Europe.
This publication is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.