Business Cycle Comovement and Labor Market Institutions

An Empirical Investigation

Raquel Fonseca Benito, Lise Patureau, Thepthida Sopraseuth

Published Aug 13, 2007

This paper examines the impact of labor market institutions (LMI) on business cycle (BC) synchronization. The authors first develop a two-country right-to-manage model of wage bargaining. They find that, following a symmetric demand change, cross-country differences in LMI generate divergent responses in employment and output. They then investigate the empirical relevance of this result using panel data of 20 OECD countries observed over 40 years. Their estimation strategy controls for a large set of possible factors influencing GDP correlations, which allows to confront their results with those found in previous studies. Consistently with their theoretical results, they find that similar labor markets tend to favor more synchronized cycles. In particular, disparity in tax wedges yields lower GDP comovement. Besides, interactions between labor market institutions do matter, as they are found to affect the effect of tax wedge divergence on BC synchronization. Their overall results suggest that the impact of distortions in demand-supply labor mechanism should be investigated in international business cycle models.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Fonseca Benito, Raquel, Lise Patureau, and Thepthida Sopraseuth, Business Cycle Comovement and Labor Market Institutions: An Empirical Investigation, RAND Corporation, WR-511, 2007. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR511.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Fonseca Benito, Raquel, Lise Patureau, and Thepthida Sopraseuth, Business Cycle Comovement and Labor Market Institutions: An Empirical Investigation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2007. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR511.html.
BibTeX RIS

This paper series was made possible by the NIA funded RAND Center for the Study of Aging and the NICHD funded RAND Population Research Center.

This publication is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.