Review of EU Data Protection Directive

Inception Report

Neil Robinson, Hans Graux, Maarten Botterman

Published Aug 26, 2008

The UK Information Commissioner's Office plans to commission a review of the EU Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC, which will cover its strengths and weaknesses and potential avenues for improvement of its application. This review will address concerns that certain provisions of the directive may no longer optimally serve their purpose of protecting data subjects against abuses of their personal data, especially given existing technical and societal changes that seem to favor facilitated and extended use of such data. The proposed study will consider a number of issues arising from the application of the directive and its impact by reviewing the broad canon of research available in this domain. This report describes in general terms the approach of the study. It also details the drivers and current contextual situation with regard to the directive and provides descriptions of the team members and each organization involved. The analysis will be accomplished by desk research into the aspects of the directive that are difficult to apply in practice or which do not contribute substantially to meeting its goals, supported by a focused set of interviews of key stakeholders to validate the information gathered. Exploration of promising avenues for the improvement of the regulatory landscape will be accomplished in a policy-orientated scenario workshop with a small number of carefully chosen participants.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2008
  • Pages: 37
  • Document Number: WR-607-ICO

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Robinson, Neil, Hans Graux, and Maarten Botterman, Review of EU Data Protection Directive: Inception Report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2008. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR607.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.