Discrimination Details Matter: Clarifying an Argument About Low-Yield Nuclear Warheads

commentary

Feb 16, 2018

The Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine USS Rhode Island (SSBN 740) returns to Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay after three months at sea

The Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine USS Rhode Island returns to Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay after three months at sea

Photo by MC1 James Kimber/U.S. Navy

This commentary originally appeared on War on the Rocks on February 16, 2018.

Perhaps the most controversial element of the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review has been the push to deploy a low-yield submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) warhead. In a recent essay on War on the Rocks, Vipin Narang describes the so-called “discrimination problem:” If an SLBM is launched, he argues, an adversary will not be able to tell that it is carrying a single low-yield warhead. They will therefore have to assume a massive nuclear assault is underway and respond accordingly.

This is a very serious defect if true, as the entire point of a low-yield submarine-launched warhead is to create more limited options for nuclear response. Yet the devil is in the details. There is strong reason to believe the problem of discrimination is both more complex and less dangerous than Narang argues.…

The remainder of this commentary is available at warontherocks.com.


Austin Long is a senior political scientist at the nonprofit, nonpartisan RAND Corporation and the author of multiple studies on nuclear strategy.