Effective State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) Policy Forum Video

Published Oct 3, 2007

For 10 years, the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) has provided, through a federal-state partnership, health coverage to millions of low-income children not covered by Medicaid. The program is up for federal reauthorization in the context of state legislative changes. In response, the Promising Practices Network hosted a policy forum of experts on June 5, 2007, to share research and experience on the past performance and future directions of SCHIP. This innovative multimedia project features interactive slide presentations alongside streaming video of the speakers. Two sessions address lessons resulting from a decade of policy research and implementation of SCHIP, including evidence on enrollment and eligibility rates for SCHIP and Medicaid, SCHIP’s impact on uninsured rates and private-insurance enrollment, program spending and cost sharing, health care disparities, state budget shortfalls and their effect on enrollment opportunity, the potential for program expansion after federal reauthorization, the variety of SCHIP structures and eligibility levels in different states, the manner in which federal funds are allocated and redistributed, potential changes to the program with its reauthorization, and the debate surrounding future eligibility requirements. Each session concludes with a question-and-answer discussion between the audience and the panelists.

This report is part of the RAND conference proceeding series. RAND conference proceedings present a collection of papers delivered at a conference or a summary of the conference.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.