Why the North Vietnamese Keep Fighting

Brian Michael Jenkins

ResearchPublished 1970

With a quarter of North Vietnam's troops in the South, her leaders historically committed to the struggle, her losses acceptable and the prize great if she wins, it is unlikely that the question of whether or not the war should be carried on is seriously debated in Hanoi. Abandoning the war involves too many political risks-among them the possibility that China might well continue support for the war in hopes of advancing her own ambitions in Indochina. Concludes the author in this assessment of North Vietnamese war intentions: while postponement or a temporary scaling down of the level of hostilities is a possibility, the arguments for continuing the struggle are too powerful to permit hopeful speculation over a North Vietnamese decision to quit the fight-especially in view of recent moves in Laos and Cambodia.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
12 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1970
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 12
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: D-20153-ARPA/AGILE

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Jenkins, Brian Michael, Why the North Vietnamese Keep Fighting, RAND Corporation, D-20153-ARPA/AGILE, 1970. As of September 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/documents/D20153.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Jenkins, Brian Michael, Why the North Vietnamese Keep Fighting. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1970. https://www.rand.org/pubs/documents/D20153.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND document series. The RAND document was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1970 representing an internal working paper series written as a step in a continuing study within RAND, which could be expanded, modified, or withdrawn at any time.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.