Evaluation of Educational Technology
What do we know and what can we know
Published 1995
What do we know and what can we know
Published 1995
It is a common perception that education in the United States is in severe trouble. Technology, particularly educational technology (EdTech), has been put forth as a solution to this and the attendant social ills. This belief, and the resulting policies focusing on EdTech, have given educational technologists a significant chance to help improve education. However, this chance comes with extremely high costs of failure. Policy makers must understand when EdTech works, and for whom, in order to make funding decisions. Answering this question requires evaluation. Evaluating EdTech is particularly difficult, however, because implementing a technology-based curriculum often involves many structural, institutional, and curricular reforms. This multitude of changes make it difficult to recognize what worked and why. One way around this problem has been to employ laboratory-based experimental methods. As is shown in this paper, these evaluations have revealed a great deal about the efficacy of EdTech in specific situations. However, laboratory-based methods do not address all of the difficulties with evaluation. Addressing the other difficulties will require that future research focus less on the particular EdTech itself, and more on its interactions with students, teachers and institutions.
This publication is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other, more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences, similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts have been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.