An Initial Look at Reprocessing, Recycle and the Waste Issue

Gregory S. Jones, Brian G. Chow

Published 1996

The claim that plutonium reprocessing and recycling eases waste management is based on incomplete assessments and inappropriate metrics. The United States should use a systems approach to compare different waste management benefits and options.

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 1996
  • Paperback Pages: 13
  • Document Number: DRU-1368-DOE

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Jones, Gregory S. and Brian G. Chow, An Initial Look at Reprocessing, Recycle and the Waste Issue, RAND Corporation, DRU-1368-DOE, 1996. As of September 16, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU1368.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Jones, Gregory S. and Brian G. Chow, An Initial Look at Reprocessing, Recycle and the Waste Issue. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1996. https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU1368.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other, more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences, similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts have been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.