Cover: Fertility, Education and Resources in South Africa

Fertility, Education and Resources in South Africa

Published 1996

by Duncan Thomas

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Population and education are likely to play a central role in public policy in South Africa as it emerges from years of apartheid. Using household survey data, collected as part of the Project for Statistics on Living Standards and Development, the paper examines some of the mechanisms that underlie the negative association between fertility and education. First, education is not randomly assigned within a population. By placing the spotlight on educational attainment around natural exit points in the education system, it is demonstrated that part, but not all, of the association between education and fertility does reflect self-selection in educational attainment. A naive interpretation of the effect as entirely causal would be misleading. Second, education and household resources tend to be correlated and so a woman's education may simply be a proxy for her, or her family's income. This turns out not to be the entire story in South Africa: after controlling for spousal characteristics, household income, labor market choices and even community characteristics, female education continues to have a powerful negative association with fertility. The third set of experiments attempts to isolate the relationship between skills that are likely to be learnt in school and demographic outcomes. After controlling for income and education, performance on a set of quantitative and comprehension tests has an independent impact on fertility. The impact of comprehension skills is particularly large in magnitude, suggesting that the acquisition and assimilation of information may be important in affecting family decision-making.

This report is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences. The draft could be considered similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts had been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.

This research in the public interest was supported by RAND, using discretionary funds made possible by the generosity of RAND's donors, the fees earned on client-funded research, and independent research and development (IR&D) funds provided by the Department of Defense.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.