Evaluation of Ambulatory Care Training by Graduates of Internal Medicine Residencies

Published In: Journal of Medical Education, v. 61, no. 4, Apr. 1986, p. 293-302

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1986

by Lawrence S. Linn, Robert H. Brook, Virginia Clark, Arlene Fink, Jacqueline Kosecoff

Read More

Access further information on this document at psycnet.apa.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

In 1984, 154 physicians who had completed residencies in internal medicine at 15 major teaching hospitals in 1982 evaluated their residency training in ambulatory care. A majority of the physicians would have liked more experience in practical areas related to career planning and office management, more input from subspecialties such as orthopedics and dermatology, greater knowledge about the management of psychosocial problems, and more information about exercise and nutrition. Although many physicians also wanted more time devoted to several other topics, less than 20 percent recommended spending less time on 26 of the 27 topics being evaluated. Since these recommendations are similar to those reported in evaluation studies published over the past 25 years, it appears that training programs in internal medicine have not been successful in restructuring their curricula to meet many of the needs of practicing physicians.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.