Board Certification and Practice Style

An Analysis of Office-Based Care

Published in: Journal of Family Practice, v. 33, No. 4, 1991, p. 395-400

Posted on on January 01, 1991

by Geoffrey M. Anderson, Robert H. Brook, Albert P. Williams

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between family practice certification and practice style has important health policy implications. We used data from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment to study the relationship between family practice certification and (1) patient characteristics including age and sex of patients, and (2) facets of practice style including probability of hospital admission, number of visits in an episode of care, number of physicians seen per episode, total charges per episode, charges per service category, and inputs per service category. METHODS: Data on health care service utilization by a sample of 5554 nonelderly individuals over a 1-year period were used to define episodes of care. Multivariate regression techniques were used to measure the association between family practice certification and patient characteristics and between family practice certification and practice style, controlling for the effects of patients characteristics. RESULTS: Patients of certified family physicians were an average of 3 years younger than patients of noncertified family physicians, but other demographic characteristics were similar. Certified family physicians had higher pathology services charges and inputs, but no statistically significant differences in other measures of charges and inputs. CONCLUSIONS: Certified and noncertified family physicians treat similar patients. Certification in family practice is not associated with major differences in total service charges, but is associated with differences in the use of laboratory diagnostic services.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.