HMO Vs Fee-for-Service Care of Older Persons with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Published in: American Journal of Public Health, v. 82, no. 12, Dec. 1992, p. 1626-1630

Posted on on January 01, 1992

by David Carlisle, Albert L. Siu, Emmett B. Keeler, Elizabeth A. McGlynn, Katherine L. Kahn, Lisa V. Rubenstein, Robert H. Brook

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Compares care for older patients with acute myocardial infarction in HMOs with their care under the fee-for-service system. It demonstrates that the survival rate in HMOs was exactly the same as in traditional fee-for-service facilities and that compliance with process criteria was higher for the HMO group as a whole. This article supports the view that HMOs can provide as good care as the fee-for-service system and suggests that health care reform using managed care organizations will not decrease quality of care.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.