Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987.

Published in: JAMA, Journal of the American Medical Association, v. 269, no. 19, May 19, 1993, p. 2513-2518

Posted on on January 01, 1993

by Jose J. Escarce

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The changes in physician fees that will occur under the resource-based Medicare Fee Schedule (MFS) are similar to those that took place under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA 87), when Medicare fees for selected overpriced procedures and diagnostic tests were reduced. To gain insight regarding the changes in utilization that may occur under the MFS, this study examines the effects of the OBRA 87 fee reductions on the use of physician services by Medicare patients. The five specialties that were most affected by the OBRA 87 fee reductions were studied: ophthalmology, thoracic surgery, urology, orthopedic surgery, and gastroenterology. Medicare physician claims files for 1987 and 1989 were used to obtain data on utilization and fees. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the effect of changes in utilization. The best estimate of the effect of the OBRA 87 fee reductions on overall physician-services utilization, obtained by pooling the five study specialties, was that every 1% decrease in fees led to a 0.09% decrease in the volume and complexity of services (95% confidence interval, 0.49% decrease to 0.31% increase). This result was not sensitive to minor changes in the covariates included in the regression model. To calculate payment levels during the transition to MFS, the Health Care Financing Administration assumed that physicians whose Medicare revenue declines under the MFS will increase service volume and complexity enough to make up one half of the lost revenue. The findings of this study suggest that the Health Care Financing Administration's assumption was, at best, extreme.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.