Effect of Panel Composition on Appropriateness Ratings

Published in: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, v. 6, no. 3, Sep. 1994, p. 251-255

Posted on RAND.org on September 01, 1994

by Gerald M. Fraser, Dina Pilpel, Jacqueline Kosecoff, Robert H. Brook

Read More

Access further information on this document at intqhc.oxfordjournals.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Cholecystectomy is performed frequently and for relatively few indications. An all surgical panel agreed on more indications and fewer contraindications for cholecystectomy than a mixed specialty panel but did not approve indications for patients with higher comorbidity. In mixed panels subspecialists (gastroenterologists) were more conservative than generalists and surgeons. Similar findings have been shown for carotid endarterectomy. Comparing the results of British and Israeli panels showed variations in rating appropriateness that indicate differences in approach between countries. We conclude that the composition of panels will influence the assessment of appropriateness.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.