Helping Practices Reach Primary Care Goals
Lessons from the Literature
ResearchPosted on rand.org 1995Published in: Archives of Internal Medicine, v. 155, no. 11, June 12, 1995, p. 1146-1156
Lessons from the Literature
ResearchPosted on rand.org 1995Published in: Archives of Internal Medicine, v. 155, no. 11, June 12, 1995, p. 1146-1156
The authors reviewed rigorous evaluations of programs to enhance the quality and economy of primary care. They identified 36 evaluations published from 1980 through 1992. They abstracted data on objectives, setting(s), patients and processes, outcomes, and costs of care. They identified successful programs, as well as significant gaps in knowledge of how to improve aspects of care. In specific, computer reminders and social influence-based methods fostered preventive and economic care. Nurse implementation of prevention protocols increased their performance. Multidisciplinary teams improved access and economy. Regional organization of practices or telephone management improved access; regionalization also reduced emergency care. Improvements were not found in continuity, comprehensiveness, humanistic process, physical environment, or health outcomes. Primary care practices can implement several programs to continuously improve prevention and access, and to reduce costs and use of unnecessary services. Research documenting how to accomplish other major goals, including health outcome changes, in different practice types is needed.
This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.