Helping Practices Reach Primary Care Goals

Lessons from the Literature

Published in: Archives of Internal Medicine, v. 155, no. 11, June 12, 1995, p. 1146-1156

Posted on on January 01, 1995

by Elizabeth Yano, Arlene Fink, Susan H. Hirsch, Alan S. Robbins, Lisa V. Rubenstein

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The authors reviewed rigorous evaluations of programs to enhance the quality and economy of primary care. They identified 36 evaluations published from 1980 through 1992. They abstracted data on objectives, setting(s), patients and processes, outcomes, and costs of care. They identified successful programs, as well as significant gaps in knowledge of how to improve aspects of care. In specific, computer reminders and social influence-based methods fostered preventive and economic care. Nurse implementation of prevention protocols increased their performance. Multidisciplinary teams improved access and economy. Regional organization of practices or telephone management improved access; regionalization also reduced emergency care. Improvements were not found in continuity, comprehensiveness, humanistic process, physical environment, or health outcomes. Primary care practices can implement several programs to continuously improve prevention and access, and to reduce costs and use of unnecessary services. Research documenting how to accomplish other major goals, including health outcome changes, in different practice types is needed.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.