Assessing Health and Quality of Life Outcomes in Dialysis

A Report on an Institute of Medicine Workshop

Published In: American Journal of Kidney Diseases, v. 30, no. 1, July 1997, p. 140-155

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1997

by Richard A. Rettig, John H. Sadler, Klemens B. Meyer, John Wasson, George R. Parkerson, Beth Kantz, Ron D. Hays, Donald L. Patrick

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.ajkd.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

A special report on an Institute of Medicine Workshop assessing health and quality-of-life outcomes in dialysis. The conclusion of the workshop was that there was no one best quality-of-life instrument. However, the workshop agreed that a number of valid instruments exist and others are being developed. Priority should go to gaining experience using these instruments in the clinical setting, acquiring enough data to interpret quality-of-life scale scored differences in a consistent way, and beginning the correlation of quality-of-life data with clinical outcome measures. The challenge to the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) community is to reach consensus quickly on measurable, quantifiable process and outcome measures that operationally define quality of care and that will allow ESRD providers to show that high value truly comes from high quality of care.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.