Variations in Cataract Extraction Rates in Medicare Prepaid and Fee-for-Service Settings

Published In: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association, v. 277, no. 22, June 11, 1997, p. 1765-1768

Posted on on January 01, 1997

by Caroline Lubick-Goldzweig, Brian Mittman, Grace M. Carter, Tenzing Donyo, Robert H. Brook, Paul Lee, Carol Mangione

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Also examines variation in the use of procedures--this time, cataract extraction in Medicare prepaid and fee-for-service (FFS) settings. The study was based on a cross-sectional analysis using 1993 Medicare claims and encounter files. The main outcome was age and risk-adjusted rates of cataract extraction per 1,000 beneficiary-years. After controlling for age, sex, and diabetes status, the authors found that FFS beneficiaries were twice as likely to undergo cataract extraction as were prepaid beneficiaries, and that female FFS beneficiaries were nearly twice as likely to undergo the procedure as were male FFS beneficiaries. These huge differences in performance of cataract surgery between managed care and fee-for-service systems deserve further clinical investigation to determine whether there is overuse in the FFS system, or underuse in the prepaid settings. Such investigations must assess the appropriateness of cataract surgery by evaluating its use relative to clinical need. This article, like the previous article, calls for the performance of detailed clinical studies to determine the relative amount of over- and underuse in the FFS and managed care settings.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.