Increasing Immunization Rates Among Inner-City, African American Children

A Randomized Trial of Case Management

Published In: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association, v. 279, no. 1, Jan. 7, 1998, p. 29-34

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1998

by David L. Wood, Neal Halfon, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Rebecca Mazel, Mark A. Schuster, Julie Hamlin, Margaret Pereyra, Patricia Camp, Mark Grabowsky, Naihua Duan

Read More

Access further information on this document at jama.ama-assn.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of case management in raising immunization levels among infants of inner-city, African American families. Patients included a representative sample of 419 African American infants and their families from low-income areas of inner-city Los Angeles, Calif. A total of 365 newborns were followed up to age 1 year. Overall, the immunization completion for the case management group was 13.2 percentage points higher than the control group. In a logistic model, the case management effect was limited to the 25 per cent of the sample who reported 3 or fewer well-child visits; for them, immunization levels increased by 28 percentage points. Although for the case management group intervention was not cost-effective ($12,022 per additional child immunized), it was better ($4546) for the 25 per cent of the sample identified retrospectively to have inadequate utilization of preventive health visits. A case management intervention in the first year of life was effective but not cost-effective at raising immunization levels in inner-city, African American infants. The intervention was demonstrated to be particularly effective for subpopulations that do not access well-child care; however, currently there are not means to identify these groups prospectively. For case management to be a useful tool to raise immunizations levels among high-risk populations, better methods of tracking and targeting, such as immunization registries, need to be developed.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.