The Structure of Satisfaction with Pharmacy Services

Published in: Medical Care, v. 36, no. 2, Feb. 1998, p. 244-250

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1998

by Jeffrey A. Johnson, Stephen Coons, Ron D. Hays

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.jstor.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The objectives of this investigation were to evaluate the dimensional structure of satisfaction with pharmacy services, to determine whether satisfaction is best viewed as a unidimensional or multidimensional construct, and to determine the degree of correspondence between a general satisfaction scale and satisfaction with specific aspects of pharmacy services. Data were collected via telephone interviews of 509 patrons of traditional retail pharmacies and analyzed using structural equation modeling techniques. The hypothesized, multidimensional measurement model fit the observed data reasonably well. However, correlations between the latent dimensions of satisfaction with pharmacy services indicated that some dimensions were empirically indistinguishable. Considering item content and theoretical considerations, modifications to the structure of previously used measures of satisfaction with pharmacy services were suggested. The data also support the hypothesis of a hierarchical model in which general satisfaction could be simultaneously represented as both an overall domain and as a set of distinct dimensions tapping unique aspects of satisfaction with pharmacy services. Depending on the purpose of the measurement, either or both levels of analysis may be useful.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.