Implementing Publicly Funded Risk Contracts with Community Mental Health Organizations

Published in: Psychiatric Services, v. 49, no. 12, Dec. 1998, p. 1579-1584

Posted on on January 01, 1998

by Alexander Young, Greer Sullivan, Dennis Murata, Roland Sturm, Paul Koegel

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The study analyzed the experience of the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health with implementation of new contractual arrangements for services for patients with severe mental illness. The arrangements shifted the financial risk for treatment to community organizations and paid a fixed annual rate per enrolled patient without further adjustment for severity of illness. Patients were assigned to the program based on high prior treatment costs. The new contractual approach enhanced programs' flexibility and accountability and increased their emphasis on principles of psychosocial rehabilitation. Challenges in implementation included disenrollment of the majority of assigned patients by the community organizations at risk for high treatment costs. Prior treatment costs for continuing cases, while high, were lower than those for disenrolled cases. Existing information systems provided limited clinical and cost data, making it difficult to monitor providers' performance. Risk contracting required substantial clinical, fiscal, and management changes at community organizations and the mental health authority. The analysis suggests that mental health authorities that are planning to institute risk contracts need to balance fiscal incentives with performance guarantees and to pay particular attention to information systems requirements and to the severity of patients' illness. Although risk contracts present challenges, they can lead to improvements in service delivery that persist beyond the implementation phase.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.