On the Road to Collaborative Treatment Planning
Consumer and Provider Perspectives
Published In: The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, v. 26, no. 2, May 1999, p. 211-218
Posted on RAND.org on May 01, 1999
Read More
Access further information on this document at www.springerlink.comThis article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.
Although consumers have made significant gains in having their voices heard in several areas within mental health, they have made less progress in being able to collaborate with their own treaters in setting treatment goals. Based on several years of ground-work by staff at the Connecticut Mental Health Center (CMHC), the Patient Care Committee conducted a needs assessment of providers and consumers to assess both groups' current involvement, interest in, and attitudes toward collaborative treatment planning. The results indicate that providers tend to place much of the responsibility for the difficulties in implementing collaborative treatment planning on consumers. Also, providers tend to underestimate consumers' interest in participating in this process. Implications of these findings for the development of an agency-wide training to enhance the collaborative nature of treatment planning are discussed.
This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.