Cover: The Effects of Patient Race on Outcomes in Seriously Ill Patients in SUPPORT

The Effects of Patient Race on Outcomes in Seriously Ill Patients in SUPPORT

An Overview of Economic Impact, Medical Intervention, and End-of-Life Decisions

Published in: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, v. 48, no. 5, suppl., May 2000, p. S194-S198

Posted on 2000

by Marie L. Borum, Zhenshao Zhong, Joanne Lynn

BACKGROUND: Black Americans have significantly lower life expectancy than white Americans. Racial differences in medical access, management, and DNR orders have been documented. OBJECTIVE: To review the effects of patient race on intervention and end-of-life decisions in seriously ill patients in the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). DESIGN: Review of published analyses from SUPPORT. SETTING: Five teaching hospitals PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9105 patients aged 18 years or older (15% black race) meeting diagnostic and illness severity criteria. MEASUREMENT: Analysis of data collected by chart abstraction and interviews. RESULTS: Blacks reported significant loss in savings, although adjusting for diagnosis and disease severity did not demonstrate significant racial differences. Economic hardship was associated with a preference for comfort care, except in black patients (OR 0.71; CI 95%, 0.57-0.88). Blacks received less intervention with no significant difference in survival. Pain level and control were not affected by race. Blacks were more likely to want CPR, although adjustment for self-pay or Medicaid eliminated racial differences. Blacks were more likely to continue to prefer CPR 2 months after hospitalization (28% vs 17%) and were more likely to change a DNR order to preferring CPR (40 vs 27%). Blacks also more frequently wished to discuss CPR preferences with their physicians but were less likely to have this type of communication (OR 1.53; CI 95%, 1.11-2.11). CONCLUSIONS: Patient race may impact on medical intervention and preferences in seriously ill patients. However, in this population, the differences are of modest clinical importance.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.