Global Access

Strategy 2000

Published in: Air Force Journal of Logistics, v. XXIV, no. 2, Summer 2000, p. 22-27, 42-43

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2000

by David A. Shlapak, John Stillion, Olga Oliker, Tanya Charlick-Paley, Robert S. Tripp, Clifford A. Grammich

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.aflma.hq.af.mil

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Defense basing decisions reflect both military needs and political conditions. The recent history of Air Force expeditionary operations points to six key variables affecting the options available to logisticians and planners when confronted with access and basing decisions. Those working to favor cooperation from other nations are close alignment and sustained military connections, shared interests and objectives, and hopes for closer ties with the United States. Those working against cooperation with the United States are fear of reprisals, conflicting goals and interests, and adverse domestic public opinion. In seeking access and basing options for expeditionary operations, planners should seek to maintain existing core Air Force assets overseas, develop new processes and technologies leading to more flexible access and basing options, and exploit new political opportunities for access and basing as they develop.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.