Comparing Consumer and Nonconsumer Provided Case Management Services for Homeless Persons with Serious Mental Illness

Published in: The Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, v. 188, no. 7, July 2000, p. 446-453

Posted on RAND.org on July 01, 2000

by Matthew Chinman, Robert A. Rosenheck, Julie A. Lam, Larry Davidson

This study compared the outcomes of services provided by case managers who are mental health system consumers and case managers who were not consumers. The study focused on the first two cohorts that entered the ACCESS program, a 5-year demonstration program funded by the Center for Mental Health Services between 1994 and 1996. We tested the associations between the type of case manager and clinical outcomes at three time points (baseline, 3 months, and 12 months). A series of one-way repeated measures of analyses of variance were conducted on clients from ACCESS sites that hired consumer providers. Although there were significant effects of Time for almost every outcome measure (clients improved over time), there were no significant Time × Case Manager Type interactions. Staff age, race, or gender did not significantly alter the pattern of these results. Given that services provided by consumers and nonconsumers were associated with equivalent client outcomes, the present study shows, using a large sample, the ability of consumers to provide mental health services as members of a case management team.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.