Important Influences on Effectiveness and Costs to Be Considered in the Evaluation of Cancer Screening

Published in: Quantitative Methods For the Evaluation of Cancer screening / Edited by Duffy S, Hill C, Esteve J (Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 13-25

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2001

by Rob Boer, Harry de Koning, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Paul J. van der Maas

Trials of cancer screening are designed to give an answer to the question of whether screening is effective, in particular in reducing cancer mortality. The main result of such a design is presented as a relative risk of dying from cancer in the study group (invited to screening) as compared to the control group (not invited). This relative risk is often treated as a constant which does not depend on the particular screening situation (Elwood el at., 1993). But it has been shown that the cost-effectiveness ratio can differ strongly with economic context (Brown and Fintor, 1993). Besides the economic context, effectiveness and costs of screening also strongly depend on several other aspects of the screening situation. In this chapter we describe such aspects and give some examples of quantification of their influence as estimated with the aid of the MISCAN simulation package (Habbema et al., 1985; Loeve et al., 1999) with examples mainly from models of breast cancer screening (van Oortmarssen et al., 1990; de Koning et al., 1991; de Koning et al., 1995), because international interest has focused strongly on screening for cancer of this site. Other examples are mostly from models of cervical cancer screening (van Ballegooijen et al., 1990; Koopmanschap et al., 1990; van Ballegooijen et al., 1992a; van Ballegooijen et al., 1995; van Ballegooijen et al., 1997). The authors models on prostate cancer screening (Boer et al., 1997) and colorectal cancer screening (Loeve et al., 1999) are not yet suitable for public health decision support because the evidence on efficacy is too preliminary for prostate cancer screening in general and for colorectal cancer screening if any screening modality other than faecal occult blood testing is to be considered. Results from trials are essential for sensible public health decisions on cancer screening In this chapter it is shown that they cannot automatically be extrapolated to population screening situations without taking into account epidemiology, demography, screening; quality, policy and history, clinical practice and costs. The role of these components of detailed evaluation of a screening programme are now described in more detail.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.