The Care of HIV-infected Adults in Rural Areas of the United States

Published in: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, v. 28, no. 4, Dec. 1, 2001, p. 385-392

Posted on on January 01, 2001

by Susan E. Cohn, Marc L. Berk, Sandra H. Berry, Naihua Duan, Martin Frankel, Jonathan D. Klein, Martha M. McKinney, Afshin Rastegar, Stephen M. Smith, Martin F. Shapiro, et al.

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes the population of HIV-infected adults receiving care in rural areas of the United States and compares HIV care received in rural and urban areas. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with a nationally representative sample of 367 HIV-infected adults receiving health care in rural areas and 2806 HIV-infected adults receiving health care in urban areas of the contiguous United States. RESULTS: The authors estimate that 4800 HIV-infected persons received medical care in rural areas during the first half of 1996. Patients in rural HIV care were more likely than patients in urban HIV care to receive care from providers seeing few (<10) HIV-infected patients (38% vs. 3%; p <.001). Rural care patients were less likely than urban care patients to have taken highly active antiretroviral agents (57% vs. 73%; p <.001) or Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylactic medication when indicated (60% vs. 75%; p =.006). CONCLUSIONS: Few American adults received HIV care in rural areas of the United States. Their findings suggest ongoing disparities between urban and rural areas in access to high-quality HIV care.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.