Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Care for Uninsured and Insured Adults
Published in: Health Services Research, v. 37, no. 4, Aug. 2002, p. 1055-1066
Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2002
Objective To compare adults with different insurance coverage in care for alcohol, drug abuse, and mental health (ADM) problems. Data Sources/Study Setting From a national telephone survey of 9,585 respondents. Design. Follow-up of adult participants in the Community Tracking Study. Data Collection Self-report survey of insurance plan (Medicare, Medicaid, unmanaged, fully, or partially managed private, or uninsured), ADM need, use of ADM services and treatments, and satisfaction with care in the last 12 months. Principal Methods Logistic and linear regressions were used to compare persons by insurance type in ADM use. Principal Findings The likelihood of ADM care was highest under Medicaid and lowest for the uninsured and those under Medicare. Perceived unmet need was highest for the uninsured and lowest under Medicare. Persons in fully rather than partially managed private plans tend to be more likely to have ADM care and ADM treatments given need. Satisfaction with care was high in public plans and low for the uninsured. Conclusions The uninsured have the most problems with access to and quality of ADM care, relative to the somewhat comparable Medicaid population. Persons in fully managed plans had better rather than worse access and quality compared to partially managed plans, but findings are exploratory. Despite low ADM use, those with Medicare tend to be satisfied. Across plans, unmet need for ADM care was high, suggesting changes are needed in policy and practice.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.