Current Validity of AHRQ Clinical Practice Guidelines

Published in: Technical Review: no. 6 (Prepared By the Southern California/RAND Evidence-based Practice Center Under Contract No. 290-97-0001). AHRQ Publication No. 02-0035. (Rockville, MD : Agency For Healthcare Research and Quality, Sep. 2002)

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2002

by Eduardo Ortiz, Martin P. Eccles, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Steven H. Woolf, Paul G. Shekelle, Sally C. Morton

Read More

Access further information on this document at archive.ahrq.gov

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Researchers first developed a conceptual model for evaluating when guidelines may need to be updated or withdrawn. Based on consultation with several experts, researchers propose that there are six situations, listed below, that may require a guideline to be updated (or withdrawn) relating to changes in evidence, changes in the values placed on evidence, changes in resources available for health care, and changes in performance. New preventive, diagnostic, or treatment interventions may have emerged to complement or supercede other interventions. New evidence may require updating of the estimates of benefits and harms for existing interventions. New evidence may identify as important outcomes that were previously unappreciated or wholly unrecognized. Evidence that current practice is optimal may change. The values that individuals or society place on different outcomes may change over time. The resources available for health care may change significantly.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.