Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey (CAHPS)

Published in: Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, v. 25, no. 3, Aug. 2003, p. 386-409

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2003

by Leo S. Morales, Robert Weech-Maldonado, Marc N. Elliott, Beverly A. Weidmer, Ron D. Hays

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.sagepub.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This study describes the psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessments of Health Plans Survey (CAHPS) in 279 persons who completed it in Spanish and 439 persons who completed it in English. The authors found negatively skewed distributions of responses and significant ceiling effects in both English and Spanish surveys. Cronbach's alphas for English and Spanish multiple-item composites were 0.69 or higher. Correlations between the CAHPS measures and willingness of individuals to recommend their doctor and health plan to family and friends were all moderately strong and statistically significant except for one global rating. There were significant differences in the patterns of correlations between global ratings and composites for English and Spanish surveys. This study suggests that the Spanish CAHPS 2.0 core survey has acceptable psychometric properties.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.