Entertainment Television as a Healthy Sex Educator

The Impact of Condom-Efficacy Information in an Episode of Friends

Published in: Pediatrics, v. 112, no. 5, Nov. 2003, p. 1115-1121

by Rebecca L. Collins, Marc N. Elliott, Sandra H. Berry, David E. Kanouse, Sarah B. Hunter

Read More

Access further information on this document at pediatrics.aappublications.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

CONTEXT: Television is often decried as a negative influence on the sexual attitudes and behavior of America's adolescents. However, television occasionally includes messages about the risks of having sex that may have a positive effect on youth. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of condom-efficacy messages in an episode of Friends on teens. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of 506 adolescents 12 to 17 years old who had been regular viewers of Friends the previous year were surveyed by telephone shortly after the episode aired. OUTCOME MEASURES: Viewership of the Friends episode, recall of the condom-efficacy message, beliefs about condoms, self-reported change in condom knowledge, and discussions of condom efficacy with parents. RESULTS: At least 27% of the sample saw the episode, and 65% of these viewers recalled its depiction of condom failure resulting in pregnancy. Forty percent of the viewers watched with an adult. Ten percent of viewers talked to an adult about condom efficacy as a result of the show. Compared with other viewers, youth who talked with an adult were more likely to report learning about condoms from the episode and appeared less likely to reduce their perceptions of condom efficacy after the episode. CONCLUSIONS: Entertainment television can serve as a healthy sex educator and can work in conjunction with parents to improve adolescent sexual knowledge.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.