Syndromic Surveillance

Is It Worth the Effort?

Published in: Chance, v. 17, no. 1, 2004, p. 19-24

Posted on on January 01, 2004

by Michael A. Stoto, Matthias Schonlau, Louis T. Mariano

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Unlike bombings, bioterrorism can be invisible, unapparent until people become ill, spreading silently as infected people interact with others. The sooner public health officials know about a bioterrorist attack, the more effective their response can be. In this article, the authors discuss the feasibility of using syndromic surveillance as an early warning system of bioterrorism. Syndromic surveillance involves the statistical analyses of data on individuals seeking care in emergency rooms or other health care settings for early symptoms of bioterrorist agents. The authors discuss results of a simple simulation they conducted using data from the emergency department at the George Washington University Hospital in Washington, D.C., to simulate a bioterrorist attack and examined how four different detection algorithms performed. They then discuss how performance can be improved and the challenges of integrating syndromic surveillance into public health systems. The authors conclude that the benefits of syndromic surveillance have not yet been established, and they caution city and state health departments about investing in costly syndromic surveillance systems until more research is done to improve their sensitivity. They add, however, that the potential of syndromic surveillance might be greater for monitoring naturally occurring diseases (such as the start of the flu season, sexually transmitted diseases, etc.) than for bioterrorism, and that this potential may make it worth the effort.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.