Does Relative Deprivation Predict the Need for Mental Health Services?

Published in: Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, v. 7, no. 4, Dec. 13, 2004, p. 167-175

Posted on on December 31, 2003

by Christine Eibner, Roland Sturm, Carole Roan Gresenz

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: Several studies postulate that psychological conditions may contribute to the link between low relative income and poor health, but no one has directly tested the relationship between relative deprivation and mental health disorders. In this paper, the authors investigate whether low income relative to a reference group is associated with a higher probability of depressive disorders or anxiety disorders. Reference groups are defined using groups of individuals with similar demographic and geographic characteristics. The authors hypothesize that perceptions of low social status relative to one's reference group might lead to worse health outcomes. AIMS: The authors attempt to determine whether an individual's income status relative to a reference group affects mental health outcomes. Our contributions to the literature include (i) defining reference groups using demographic characteristics in addition to geographic area, (ii) looking at an individual's relative income status rather than low income or aggregate-level income inequality, and (iii) focusing specifically on mental-health related outcomes. METHODS: Our primary data source is the national household survey component of HealthCare for Communities (HCC), funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to track the effects of the changing health care system on individuals at risk for alcohol, drug abuse, or mental health disorders. HCC is a complement to the Community Tracking Survey (CTS) and reinterviews participants of the main study. To construct relative deprivation measures, the authors used data from the 5% Public Use Micro Data Sample of the 2000 Census. Our measure of relative deprivation is defined using Yitzhaki's index, a term that measures the expected income difference between an individual and others in his or her reference group that are more affluent. They evaluate the relationship between relative deprivation and mental health using conditional logit models with reference group random effects. RESULTS: Even after controlling for an individual's absolute income status, those with low relative income are at higher risk of experiencing a mental health disorder. Our findings hold for both depressive disorders and anxiety/panic disorders. DISCUSSION AND LIMITATIONS: Our findings suggest that relative deprivation is associated with an increased likelihood of probable depression and anxiety or panic disorders. Simulations suggest that a 25 percent decrease in relative deprivation could decrease the probability of any likely mental health disorder by as much as 9.5 percent. Limitations of this study include the fact that we only have one measure of relative deprivation, and that reference groups are defined using relatively large geographic areas. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY: Low relative income may contribute to socioeconomic disparities in mental health. Efforts to eradicate socioeconomic differentials should take into account psychological perceptions and self-esteem in addition to absolute material resources. IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH: Future work should explore whether mental health disorders explain the link between relative deprivation and poor physical health.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.