Shaping Smoking Cessation Using Percentile Schedules

Published in: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, v. 76, no. 3, Dec. 2004, p. 247-259

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2004

by Richard J. Lamb, Andrew R. Morral, Kimberly C. Kirby, Martin Y. Iguchi, Gregory Galbicka

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.sciencedirect.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Behavioral interventions that provide incentives contingent upon abstinence are effective addiction treatments. Nevertheless, these treatments often fail for individuals whose recent behaviors are very different from those reinforced. These hard-to-treat individuals may require shaping to achieve abstinence. We used percentile schedules to shape smokers' delivery of breath samples indicative of recent smoking abstinence (breath carbon monoxide (BCO) <4 ppm). Percentile schedules deliver incentives to current behaviors proximal to the target. Participants (N = 102) were assigned to treatments delivering incentives for breath COs at or below the 10th, 30th, 50th, or 70th percentile of recent breath COs. Each condition effectively ensured contact with available contingencies, and resulted in BCO <4 ppm in >90% of the 30th, 50th and 70th percentile groups versus 63% in the 10th percentile. The 30th, 50th and 70th percentiles were especially effective in a sub-sample of hard-to-treat participants who did not deliver a breath CO <4 ppm during an initial abstinence test or during a nine-visit baseline period, suggesting the value of shaping for this important sub-sample.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.