Terrorism's Psychologic Effects and Their Implications for Primary Care Policy, Research, and Education

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine, v. 20, no. 8, Aug. 2005, p. 772-776

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2005

by David Eisenman, Bradley D. Stein, Terri Tanielian, Harold Alan Pincus

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.blackwell-synergy.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This paper examines primary care physicians' (PCP) roles in helping the nation prepare for, respond to, and recover from the psychologic consequences of chemical, biologic, radiologic, or nuclear (CBRN) terrorism. First, the authors discuss the psychologic consequences of a CBRN attack and PCPs' roles in responding to these consequences. Second, they analyze these roles in light of the known barriers to delivering high-quality, primary care based- mental health care. Third, the authors offer recommendations for mitigating these barriers and preparing PCPs to respond to the psychosocial consequences of a CBRN weapon. Importantly, our recommendations provide dual-use benefits to PCPs faced with the daily concerns of primary care mental health, including improved linkages and electronic connectivity with mental health, information technology, and decision support for providers, and needed education and research.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.