Primacy of Affect Over Cognition in Determining Adult Men's Condom-Use Behavior

A Review

Published in: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, v. 35, no. 12, Dec. 2005, p. 2493-2534

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2005

by Tina R. Norton, Laura M. Bogart, Heather Cecil, Steven D. Pinkerton

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.blackwellpublishing.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Prior research suggests that failure to use condoms can be understood within the context of condom-related attitudes. The authors reviewed quantitative and qualitative literature on adult men's condom-use attitudes; condom-related attitudinal beliefs were classified as cognitive (e.g., effectiveness) or affective (e.g., pleasure-related), and their relationships to behavior were examined. To determine differences in the effects of cognitive and affective beliefs, the authors conducted a critical qualitative review, a meta-analysis, and a vote-count. In support of the primacy of affect hypothesis (Zajonc, 1984), cognitive beliefs were weaker predictors of condom use than were affective beliefs. Results suggest that HIV-prevention interventions will have greater success by addressing negative affective reactions to condom use in addition to promoting the protective value of condoms.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.