Application of Group-Level Item Response Models in the Evaluation of Consumer Reports About Health Plan Quality

Published in: Multivariate Behavioral Research, v. 41, no. 1, 2006, p. 85-102

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2006

by Steven Reise, Rob R. Meijer, Andrew T. Ainsworth, Leo S. Morales, Ron D. Hays

Read More

Access further information on this document at Multivariate Behavioral Research

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Group-level parametric and non-parametric item response theory models were applied to the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) 2.0 core items in a sample of 35,572 Medicaid recipients nested within 131 health plans. Results indicated that CAHPS responses are dominated by within health plan variation, and only weakly influenced by between health plan variation. Thus, although the CAHPS 2.0 survey has acceptable psychometric properties when analyzed at the individual level, large sample sizes are needed to reliably differentiate among health plans. These results illustrate why it is important to study evaluations of health care, such as CAHPS, at multiple levels of analyses.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.