Creating the Evidence Base for the MLA Partnership

Published in: MLA, Museums Libraries Archives (London : Museums, Libraries and Archives Council, 2006)

Posted on on January 01, 2006

by Ruth Levitt, Michael Hallsworth, Lila Rabinovich, Cameron Munro

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: The Museums, Libraries and Archives (MLA) Council is the lead strategic agency for museums, libraries and archives in England. It is part of the wider MLA Partnership, working with nine regional agencies. With the aim to develop an inclusive strategy for all 10 MLA Partnership members, the responsible team of officers asked RAND Europe to examine the research commissioned by the 10 organisations in recent years. The study provided an evidence base and informed other strands of MLA's strategy. METHODS: The main task of the project was to assemble, analyse, assess and present the MLA Partnership's body of more than 750 projects revealed in a trawl of MLA Partnership's relevant material commissioned by the MLA between 2000 and July 2006. We proceeded to develop an initial database for the research projects and a thematic hierarchy to tag the projects, with input from MLA. A thorough qualitative analysis was also undertaken of a selected group of 60 of the projects. CONCLUSIONS: Clear messages about research quality from this work emerged. A stronger evidence base will enable the MLA Partnership to deliver more effectively its strategic responsibilities. Furthermore, research quality will improve where projects (a) state a clearly defined question or topic, and attempt to address it exactly, (b) use a thorough, fully documented search of relevant other work, (c) make thorough, critical use of other research, (d) adopt the most suitable methods to achieve the study aims and explain the reasoning, (e) present the findings clearly and accurately, linking arguments and data explicitly, connecting interpretations and conclusions.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.