Health-related Quality of Life and Patient Reports About Care Outcomes in a Multidisciplinary Hospital Intervention

Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine, v. 31, no. 2, Mar. 2006, p. 173-178

Posted on on January 01, 2006

by Ron D. Hays, Jo Ann Eastwood, Jenny Kotlerman, Karen Spritzer, Susan L. Ettner, Marie Cowan

Read More

Access further information on this document at Annals of Behavioral Medicine

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: Patient perceptions of care and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are important outcomes for hospitalized patients. PURPOSE: This study examined patient experiences with hospital care and HRQOL in individuals hospitalized at a west coast teaching hospital. METHODS: The authors assessed patient experiences with care and HRQOL using interviews with 1,207 hospitalized, general medicine patients participating in a multidisciplinary provider team intervention at a large academic medical center. Patient outcome variables included the Picker dimensions of hospital care (Continuity and Transition, Coordination of Care, Emotional Support, Information and Education, Involvement of Family and Friends, Physical Comfort, Respect for Patient Preferences, Overall Impression), the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3), and the SF-12 physical (PCS-12) and mental health (MCS-12) summary scores. RESULTS: Patients randomized to a multidisciplinary intervention reported higher emotional support (b = 3.32), t(xx) = 2.01, p =.044, and physical comfort (b = 3.49), t(xx) = 2.25, p = .025, from health care providers than did the control group, but these effects became nonsignificant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. The HUI-3, PCS-12, and MCS-12 summary scores improved significantly from baseline to the 30-day, ts(xx)= 4.94, 2.20, and 5.31, ps < .0001, = .03, and < .0001, respectively, and the 4-month follow-ups, ts(xx) = 7.25, 8.68, and 8.08, ps < .001, < .001, and <.0001, respectively, but change on these measures did not differ between intervention and control patients. Baseline health was significantly associated with patient evaluations of hospital care, but patient evaluations did not predict future health. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in reports and ratings of hospital care or HRQOL between the control and the intervention groups. Hence, the behavioral changes in hospital staff in the intervention group had no effect on patient-reported outcomes. Mental health at baseline was predictive of patient evaluations of the hospitalization, but evaluations of care were not associated with subsequent HRQOL. Thus, it may be important to adjust patient evaluations of hospital care for case-mix differences in health.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.