Rigorous Disease Management Evaluation

Published in: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Commentary, v. 12, no. 2, Apr. 2006, p. 121-123

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2006

by Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.blackwellpublishing.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Since the early 1990s, disease management (DM) has been one of the most heralded - and least rigorously evaluated - developments in health service delivery. The four related articles in this issue, together with the authors' other work, go a long way towards putting DM evaluation on solid statistical ground (Linden 2006; Linden & Adams 2006; Linden et al.2006). They should be read carefully by anyone purchasing or evaluating a DM programme and should raise the bar for evaluations in this area, which are often little more than marketing dressed up as research.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.