Rigorous Disease Management Evaluation
ResearchPosted on rand.org 2006Published in: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Commentary, v. 12, no. 2, Apr. 2006, p. 121-123
Since the early 1990s, disease management (DM) has been one of the most heralded - and least rigorously evaluated - developments in health service delivery. The four related articles in this issue, together with the authors' other work, go a long way towards putting DM evaluation on solid statistical ground (Linden 2006; Linden & Adams 2006; Linden et al.2006). They should be read carefully by anyone purchasing or evaluating a DM programme and should raise the bar for evaluations in this area, which are often little more than marketing dressed up as research.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: Blackwell Publishing
- Availability: Non-RAND
- Year: 2006
- Pages: 4
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: EP-200604-01
This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.