Assessing Organizational Readiness and Change in Community Intervention Research

Framework for Participatory Evaluation

Published in: Ethnicity and disease, v. 16, no. 1, suppl. 1, Winter 2006, p. S1-136-S1-145

by Susan Stockdale, Peter Mendel, Loretta Jones, William Arroyo, James Gilmore

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This paper describes a study currently underway that uses a collaborative approach to assess organizational capacity to form partnerships around mental health and substance abuse care. Employing many of the principles of community-based participatory research, the study's primary objective is to collaboratively develop a conceptual understanding and generalizable, practical measures of organizational capacity. The intent of this collaborative approach is to increase the rigor and relevance of the assessment framework while strengthening the ability of health partnerships and stakeholders to understand and track community organizational capacity. The study investigators developed an initial model of community dissemination based on the research literatures on organizations and the diffusion of innovations. Through the collaborative process, the specific goals of the project shifted substantially to match the partnership interests and concerns of community agencies. One of the benefits of a collaborative approach has been to use researchers' academic knowledge to catalogue potential factors and the wealth of community coinvestigators' experiential knowledge of interagency dynamics to identify specific relevant dimensions of capacity. This initial exploratory study represents a first step toward developing a general approach to conceptualizing and tracking the organizational capacity of communities. The model and measurement framework may have wider applicability to capacities to partner around and implement a variety of health-related interventions within communities.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.