Cover: Partially Capitated Managed Care Versus FFS for Special Needs Children

Partially Capitated Managed Care Versus FFS for Special Needs Children

Published in: Health Care Financing Review, v. 28, no. 4, Summer 2007, p. 109-123

Posted on 2007

by Cynthia R. Schuster, Jean M. Mitchell, Darrell Gaskin

Little research has examined whether Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) that incorporate case management are effective in coordinating services for children with special health care needs (CSHCN). This study evaluates the effects of enrollment of special needs children into a partially capitated MCP (with ongoing case management) versus the fee-for-service (FFS) option on use of therapeutic services, specifically speech, occupational, and physical therapy by site of service (school versus health care sector). Results show that special needs children enrolled in the partially capitated MCP are significantly more likely to obtain occupational and physical therapy at school relative to their FFS counterparts. Moreover, children enrolled in FFS are significantly less likely to be either regular or frequent users of each type of therapy relative to children enrolled in managed care. The authors attribute much of these disparities in use of therapeutic services at school to the availability of case management and coordination that is an integral component of the partially capitated MCP.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.