Effects of Interpregnancy Interval and Outcome of the Preceding Pregnancy on Pregnancy Outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh

Julie DaVanzo, Lauren Hale, Abdur Razzaque, Omar Rahman

ResearchPosted on rand.org 2007Published in: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, v. 114, no. 9, Sep. 2007, p. 1079-1087

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects on pregnancy outcomes of the duration of the preceding interpregnancy interval (IPI) and type of pregnancy outcome that began the interval. DESIGN: Observational population-based study. SETTING: The Maternal Child Health-Family Planning (MCH-FP) area of Matlab, Bangladesh. POPULATION: A total of 66,759 pregnancy outcomes that occurred between 1982 and 2002. METHODS: Bivariate tabulations and multinomial logistic regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy outcomes (live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage [spontaneous fetal loss prior to 28 weeks], and induced abortion). RESULTS: When socio-economic and demographic covariates are controlled, of the IPIs that began with a live birth, those <6 months in duration were associated with a 7.5-fold increase in the odds of an induced abortion (95% CI 6.0-9.4), a 3.3-fold increase in the odds of a miscarriage (95% CI 2.8-3.9), and a 1.6-fold increase in the odds of a stillbirth (95% CI 1.2-2.1) compared with 27- to 50-month IPIs. IPIs of 6-14 months were associated with increased odds of induced abortion (2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.6). IPIs greater than or equal to 75 months were associated with increased odds of all three types of non-live-birth (NLB) outcomes but were not as risky as very short intervals. IPIs that began with a NLB were generally more likely to end with the same type of NLB. CONCLUSIONS: Women whose pregnancies are between 15 and 75 months after a preceding pregnancy outcome (regardless of its type) have a lower likelihood of fetal loss than those with shorter or longer IPIs. Those with a preceding NLB outcome deserve special attention in counselling and monitoring.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2007
  • Pages: 9
  • Document Number: EP-200709-03

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.